valid starting

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "valid starting" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an acceptable or legitimate beginning point for a process, discussion, or argument. Example: "This is a valid starting point for our analysis of the project's requirements."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

31 human-written examples

The "valid starting" and "expires" fields describe the period of time during which the ticket is valid.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The fact that I respected all their suggestions as valid starting points for the problem largely removed their fear and hesitancy in expressing half-baked ideas.

University of California, Berkeley

The Night/Weekend permit provided by the Evening & Weekend MBA Program is valid starting at 3 30PM on weekdays in "S" Lots (e.g. Underhill and Foothill).

University of California, Berkeley

The approaches used in the study can serve as a valid starting point for further development of such tools and methods compatible with planners' ordinary working modes.

Ecological Indicators

Because the full impact of the labor agreement was not felt in the lockout-shortened 1994-95 season, the most valid starting point for comparisons of revenue and salary growth should be the 1995-96 season, union officials said.

The New York Times - Sports

The CO2QUALSTORE guideline was developed by a consortium of companies representing both power and upstream industry sectors and therefore offers a unique and valid starting point for developing a project specific, risk optimized investment schedule.

Energy Procedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

29 human-written examples

So, if the debt is valid, start out by telling them that you just got a large paycheck, tax return, etc, and that you want to clear up your credit.

WikiHow

This start sequence is critical and must be of sufficient length to synchronize the reception protocol and uniquely distinguish between a valid start-of-message and noise.

Cornell University

As a result of this, 85 start codons were changed, many of which resulted in non-standard, but valid start codons of GTG or TTG.

Plosone

In order to be considered as a valid gene (or a valid genome in the case of viruses, since they possess a single known ORF), a given ORF should not be classified as a hypothetical product, start with a valid start codon, end with a valid stop codon, have a length multiple of three, and have no ambiguous bases, here considered as a non-standard (A, C, T or G) nucleotide.

Plosone

The ribosomal protein L12ae gene (Smar_1096) does not have a valid start codon, but this is likely to be an essential gene.

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "valid starting", ensure the context clearly defines what makes the starting point valid. Be specific about the criteria for its selection.

Common error

Avoid using "valid starting" without providing context. Ensure that the basis for validity is clear to prevent ambiguity. Instead of saying "This is a valid starting point", specify why it's valid: "Based on preliminary data, this is a valid starting point."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "valid starting" functions as an adjective modifying a noun, typically "point", "place", or "position". It describes the acceptability or legitimacy of a beginning. Ludwig's examples show its use in diverse fields, indicating a broad applicability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

45%

Academia

25%

News & Media

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "valid starting" is a versatile expression used to indicate an acceptable or legitimate beginning. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and finds frequent application across science, academia, and news media. When employing "valid starting", remember to provide enough context to clarify the basis of its validity. Alternative phrases like "acceptable starting point" or "legitimate starting point" can offer variety while retaining the intended meaning. Always ensure that the reason for validity is clear to maintain the strength and clarity of your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

acceptable starting point

Replaces "valid" with a synonym that emphasizes acceptability.

legitimate starting point

Replaces "valid" with a synonym that emphasizes lawfulness and legitimacy.

reasonable starting point

Replaces "valid" with a synonym focusing on the rationale behind the selection of the starting point.

appropriate starting point

Highlights the suitability of the point to start from.

sound initial step

Shifts from a point to a step, focusing on the quality of the first move.

suitable initial position

Changes the phrasing to emphasize the suitability of the position for the start.

good initial basis

Highlights a positive foundation on which further elements build.

proper inception

Uses a more formal term for "starting".

correct point of departure

Emphasizes the correctness of the starting point for further development.

authentic beginning

Highlights the genuineness of the start.

FAQs

How can I use "valid starting" in a sentence?

You can use "valid starting" to describe a point, idea, or method that is appropriate and justified to begin with. For example, "The research paper provided a "valid starting" point for further investigation."

What's a more formal alternative to "valid starting"?

For a more formal tone, consider using "legitimate starting point" or "acceptable starting point". These options add a layer of formality and professionalism.

How does "valid starting point" differ from "initial step"?

"Valid starting point" emphasizes the justification for beginning at a certain place, while "initial step" simply refers to the first action in a process, without necessarily highlighting its validity. They can be similar, but context matters.

Is it always necessary to explicitly state why something is a "valid starting" point?

While not always required, explicitly stating why something is a "valid starting" point enhances clarity and strengthens your argument. Providing reasoning minimizes potential ambiguity and bolsters the credibility of your claims.