Sentence examples for valid scientific evidence from inspiring English sources

A previously conducted systematic review did not obtain valid scientific evidence that CST was beneficial to patients.

It asserts that "sex-segregated education is deeply misguided and often justified by weak, cherry-picked or misconstrued scientific claims rather than by valid scientific evidence".

In a statement posted on its Web site (www.sefora.org), the group said scientists and engineers had an obligation "to enter the political debate when the nation's leaders systematically ignore scientific evidence and analysis, put ideological interest ahead of scientific truths, suppress valid scientific evidence and harass and threaten scientists for speaking honestly about their research".

The current editorial reviews aspects of this proposal from the perspective of the authors in terms of their understanding of the statutory obligations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration FDAA) to regulate the marketing of cardiovascular devices based on valid scientific evidence.

The German ban on MON810 was, and must be, a political decision, guided by valid scientific evidence.

We simply argue that our study on D. magna does present valid scientific evidence that can legitimately be used to inform policy.

Specifically, it says, their decisions would be based on a patient's medical condition and medical records; "valid, relevant scientific evidence and clinical evidence, including peer-reviewed medical literature," and the consensus of experts on what treatments were appropriate.

Valid and scientific evidence showing primary operative intervention to be superior compared to closed treatment for dislocated fractures, still lacks [ 19, 20].

In making determinations under this section, other than those described in paragraph (5)(A) as to the direct causation of a covered injury, the Secretary may only make such determination based on compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence.

The Secretary may only identify such covered injuries, for purpose of inclusion on the table, where the Secretary determines, based on compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence that administration or use of the covered countermeasure directly caused such covered injury.

As late as January 2010, the committee's co-chair, the neurologist Dr Ira Casson, argued that: "There is not enough valid, reliable or objective scientific evidence at present to determine whether or not repeat head impacts in professional football result in long-term brain damage".