Sentence examples for valid judgments from inspiring English sources

To accept the defendant's argument and establish a due process right to retest evidence with each advance in forensic science "would leave perfectly valid judgments in a perpetually unsettled state," the panel held.

Kant's second maxim, "to think into the place of others," shows that he regards communication as essential to making valid judgments and to acting wisely.

But from this it does not follow that there cannot be "empty" concepts or "blind" intuitions outside the special context of objectively valid judgments.

Merely subjective judgments of perception are parasitic on objectively valid judgments of experience, because self-consciousness requires that I place myself in an objective world and refer at least some of my representations to objects distinct from me.

Conceptualizing experience as involving an objective order and arrangement of items amounts to making objectively valid judgments about it, which, in turn, implies that experience must consist of a rule-governed connectedness of representations (1966: 98).

The answer is that what Kant is actually saying in the famous texts at A50 51/B74 76 is that intuitions and concepts are cognitively complementary and semantically interdependent for the specific purpose of constituting objectively valid judgments.

"It's not going to be possible in 2014 to make a strong valid judgment of whether the exchanges are working or not".

Jurisdiction over property, a necessity for any valid judgment that disposes of the property itself, may be obtained by seizure or attachment of the property by the court.

"The transactions are highly suspicious, and we are investigating to see whether they were fraudulent and done to prevent us from collecting on a valid judgment".

Most importantly however, according to Kant the "nominal definition" of truth is that it is the "agreement" or "correspondence" (Übereinstimmung) of a cognition (i.e., in this context, an objectively valid judgment) with its object (A58/B82).

What this means then is that every objectively valid judgment, whether empirical or a priori, and in particular synthetic a priori, must implicitly include a schematic a priori formal temporal component that functions as an intermediate structure for interpreting the purely logical elements of judgments and thereby securing their applicability to objects of actual or possible experience.