valid descriptor

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "valid descriptor" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a term or label that accurately represents or describes something. Example: "In the context of data analysis, 'customer satisfaction' is a valid descriptor for measuring user experience."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

Flew, in his last years, considered himself to be just such a persuaded sceptic, and hence accepted the term Deist as a valid descriptor for his religious standpoint.

Wikipedia

Although the final products vary in specific details, they reflect an implicit consensus that a valid descriptor of organ dysfunction should meet certain criteria (Table 1).

Critical Care

These findings highlight that the RPt Pt can serve as a valid descriptor for compressive-strain effects and nicely bridges the atomic composition and the ORR activity of Pt-based catalysts.

ACS Nano

It is thus tempting to examine whether the bulk average RPt Pt, which can be readily measured under operating conditions by XAS, can serve as a valid descriptor for compressive-strain effects.

ACS Nano

The linear correlations established between the ORR activity and the bulk RPt Pt and between the bulk RPt Pt and the in situ atomic composition demonstrate that the bulk RPt Pt is a valid descriptor for compressive-strain effects and nicely bridges the atomic composition and the ORR activity of PtM NP catalysts.

ACS Nano

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

As they put it: EmotionML provides mechanisms to represent emotions in terms of scientifically valid descriptors: categories, dimensions, appraisals, and action tendencies.

The New Yorker

Although the total dose-rate and areal dose-rate at a constant illumination area are equally valid descriptors for the TEM image resolution of specimens immersed in a gas environment, the latter has significant advantages.

Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging

The goal of this work is to develop an in-depth understanding of the relationships between the composition structure and structure activity of Pt-based bimetallic NPs under in situ electrochemical conditions and to seek valid descriptors of their ORR activity.

ACS Nano

Neither has a valid activity descriptor that can be easily controlled and measured been identified.

ACS Nano

These linear correlations together demonstrate that (i) the improved ORR activity of Pt x Co/C NPs over pure Pt NPs originates predominantly from the compressive strain and (ii) the RPt Pt is a valid strain descriptor that bridges the activity and atomic composition of Pt-based bimetallic NPs.

ACS Nano

These two effects can be fully accounted for by the d-band theory developed by Nørskov et al., which demonstrates that the Pt surface d-band center (with some limitations) or the Pt O binding energy can serve as a valid activity descriptor for Pt-based catalysts with well-characterized surfaces.

ACS Nano

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "valid descriptor", ensure the descriptor accurately and reliably represents the concept or entity it describes. Provide evidence or justification for its validity, especially in technical or scientific contexts.

Common error

Avoid assuming a descriptor is "valid" in all contexts. A descriptor might be valid for a specific purpose or dataset, but not universally applicable. Always specify the scope of its validity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "valid descriptor" functions as an adjective-noun combination, where 'valid' modifies 'descriptor'. It's used to emphasize the accuracy and appropriateness of a term or label. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "valid descriptor" is a grammatically correct phrase used to denote a term or label that accurately represents something within a specific context. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is indeed correct and usable in written English. It's most commonly found in scientific and technical writing, where precision and accuracy are paramount. Remember to justify the validity of the descriptor and avoid overgeneralizing its applicability. Consider alternatives like "accurate term" or "appropriate label" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Ensure clarity in the context for which the descriptor is "valid" to avoid misinterpretations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

accurate term

Focuses on the correctness and precision of the term.

appropriate label

Emphasizes the suitability and relevance of the label.

legitimate designation

Highlights the lawfulness and acceptance of the designation.

suitable characterization

Focuses on the fitting nature of the characterization.

sound indicator

Emphasizes the reliability and robustness of the indicator.

reliable metric

Highlights the dependability of the measurement.

acceptable representation

Focuses on the adequacy of the representation.

justifiable classification

Emphasizes the rationale behind the categorization.

verifiable attribute

Highlights the testability of the attribute.

confirmed feature

Focuses on the established presence of the feature.

FAQs

What does "valid descriptor" mean?

A "valid descriptor" is a term or label that accurately and reliably represents a specific concept, characteristic, or entity within a defined context. It implies that the descriptor has been verified or justified as appropriate for its intended purpose.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "valid descriptor"?

Use "valid descriptor" when you need to emphasize that a particular term or label has been rigorously assessed and confirmed to be accurate and appropriate for its intended use, especially in scientific, technical, or academic contexts.

What are some alternatives to using "valid descriptor"?

Alternatives include "accurate term", "appropriate label", or "reliable metric", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How can I ensure that a descriptor is truly "valid"?

To ensure a descriptor's validity, provide evidence or justification for its use, such as empirical data, theoretical support, or expert consensus. Clearly define the context in which the descriptor is considered valid and acknowledge any limitations.