valid argument

USAGE SUMMARY

"valid argument" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that an argument is logically sound and has been well-reasoned. For example: "His valid argument was convincing and well-supported by evidence, so the judge ruled in his favor."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Yes, that's a valid argument.

The New York Times

Is that a valid argument?

The New York Times

That's a valid argument.

Yale University

"It's a very valid argument".

The New York Times

He made a valid argument.

The Guardian - Sport

They feel they have a valid argument.

The Guardian

But amid the cliches there is a valid argument.

The Guardian - Opinion

3. Which of the following could a valid argument have?

The New York Times

"This is not a valid argument," Nutan responds.

The New Yorker

Dan, you made a very valid argument however.

Harvard Business Review

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

It was a valid argument and a good reason to party. .

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting an argument, ensure it is not only logically sound but also supported by credible evidence to make it a truly "valid argument".

Common error

Avoid assuming that because two things are related, one causes the other; a "valid argument" requires establishing a causal link, not just a correlation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "valid argument" functions as a noun phrase, where "valid" modifies "argument". It describes an argument that adheres to logical principles and has a sound structure. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Academia

21%

Science

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "valid argument" is a frequently used phrase that describes an argument with a sound logical structure. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and suitable for use in various contexts. Predominantly found in news, academic, and scientific writing, it indicates that an argument is well-reasoned and defensible. Related phrases include "sound reasoning" and "cogent argument". When using the term, ensure the argument is not only logically sound but also supported by credible evidence. Avoid logical fallacies, such as mistaking correlation for causation, to maintain the integrity of the argument.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cogent argument

Emphasizes the clarity and persuasiveness of the argument.

well-founded claim

Stresses the existence of a solid base of evidence and reasoning.

sound reasoning

Focuses on the quality of the reasoning process itself.

strong case

Highlights the compelling nature and provability of the position.

legitimate point

Highlights the acceptability and lawfulness of the idea.

persuasive rationale

Indicates that the reasoning is effective in convincing others.

justifiable assertion

Emphasizes the defensibility and rightness of the statement.

defensible position

Focuses on the ability to protect the idea from criticism.

tenable argument

Emphasizes the possibility of the idea being maintained or defended.

reasonable contention

Highlights the fairness and logic of the debate.

FAQs

How can I use "valid argument" in a sentence?

You can use "valid argument" to describe a point that is logically sound and well-supported, such as: "The lawyer presented a "strong case" based on a "cogent argument", demonstrating the defendant's innocence."

What are some synonyms for "valid argument"?

Alternatives to "valid argument" include "sound reasoning", "cogent argument", or "legitimate point", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

What makes an argument "valid"?

An argument is "valid" if its conclusion logically follows from its premises. Even if the premises are false, the argument's structure can still be valid, though it may not be sound.

How does a "valid argument" differ from a "sound argument"?

A "valid argument" has a correct logical structure, whereas a "sound argument" is both valid and has true premises. Therefore, a sound argument guarantees a true conclusion.