The application of Conversation Analysis (CA) to the investigation of agrammatic aphasia reveals that utterances produced by speakers with agrammatism engaged in everyday conversation differ significantly from utterances produced in response to decontextualised assessment and therapy tasks.
A case in point would be an utterance of (8) in response to a request for information about Apollo in an exam on Greek mythology.
For example, as a result of reading the last sentence, you believe that we believe that audiences regard utterers as having the intentions specified in the account of utterers' meaning when audiences are called upon to justify the beliefs and actions they form in response to utterances.
Having received explicit instruction, forty intermediate participants in this study received explicit type of feedback (matalinguistic explanation) and implicit type of feedback (recast) in response to any utterance containing an error in doing the role plays of refusals.
Why are we justified in thinking that you will form a justified belief in response to our utterance?
Likewise, Skinner held, 'understanding' the utterances of others is a matter of being trained to perform appropriate behaviors in response to them: one understands 'Shut the door!' to the extent that one responds appropriately to that utterance.
His intemperate public utterances — he called the Sejm a "prostitute" – and his sending ninety armed officers into the Sejm building in response to an impending vote of no-confidence, caused concern in contemporary and modern-day observers who have seen his actions as setting precedents for authoritarian responses to political challenges.
He argued that human linguistic behavior (that is, our own utterances and our responses to the utterances of others) is determined by two factors: (i) the current features of the environment impinging on the speaker, and (ii) the speaker's history of reinforcement (i.e., the giving or withholding of rewards and/or punishments in response to previous linguistic behaviors).
For the hearer, taking the utterance as informative, means, by default, to update his credence in the proposition as a response to the utterance, both in the upwards direction and to a level above 0.5.
Differences observed in the ERBP response to the stimulus were even more striking this site demonstrated a clear capacity to follow each syllable in the two-syllable utterance during both SV and PB, with only a slight attenuation of HGB activity seen in the response to the first syllable (Fig. 5B).
We introduce DocChat a novel information retrieval approach for human-computer conversation systems that can use unstructured documents rather than semi-structured utterance-response pairs, to react to user utterances.
