Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
But it's usually wrong.
Scully is usually wrong.
They are, I think, usually wrong.
Stereotypes of Illinois are usually wrong.
CONVENTIONAL wisdom about eastern Europe is usually wrong.
Any figure that looks interesting or different is usually wrong.
People who predict imminent catastrophes are usually wrong.
The red book's own predications are usually wrong.
The initial media hysteria in these instances is usually wrong.
When CI was outside the normal range, the clinical estimate was usually wrong (13 of 20 [65%]); when SVRI was outside the normal range, the clinical estimate was also usually wrong (16 of 22 [73%]).
It is axiomatic that early reports in confusing situations are usually wrong.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com