Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(23)
By using the same proof, we obtain that and are nonexpansive.
Using the same proof method as in Step 3, we know that y ∗ ∈ Γ.
By using the same proof as Theorem 3.2, we can easily obtain the following conclusions.
Using the same proof as in Lemma 3.2, we get a contradiction.
Then, using the same proof as that of Lemma 2.3, it can be shown that (2.20).
Using the same proof method as in Theorem 1, we get assertion of Theorem 2.
Similar(37)
Property 1 can be derived from the definition of the Z-parameter and we can use the same proof process of (24) that exploits the inequality relation between the arithmetic mean and the geometric mean.
end{aligned} Using the same idea of proof (7), we can obtain the proof of (8).
For (N=infty), we can prove the most results by using the same method of proof.
Using the same means, our proof method can easily carry over to the general finite case.
Moreover, we have p ( x ∗, x ∗ ) = 0. Proof Using the same notations as in the proof of Corollary 3.1, one can show easily from (16) that for all x, y ∈ X, we have.
More suggestions(15)
using the same test
using the same evidences
using the same tests
use the same proof
using the same concept
using the same language
using the same scale
using the same password
using the same explanation
using the same playbook
using the same one
using the same muscle
using the above proof
using the same trick
using the same tool
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com