Similar(60)
In MEG Experiment 2, we used the same (gender identification) task as in the behavioral experiment.
These findings were consistent with two previous studies which used the same gender stereotype questionnaire (Hausmann et al., 2009; Hirnstein, Freund, & Hausmann, 2012).
This was previously a privilege reserved for dudes, because of, haha, literally the manner in which we're socially conditioned from birth; but because people are using the same apps regardless of gender, there's generally the sense that we can all date casually – that is, with little or no commitment – without judgment, at least from our peers.
Model 3, which separated the benign tumour patients (67% men, 57% smokers) from the healthy controls, was also found to be stable against smoking status and gender, using the same strategy as before.
There was reduction but with significant difference between men and women violence acceptance attitudes, unlike in previous studies which did not show any differential effect on gender using the same approach (21).
To evaluate the gender and racial/ethnic differences in the associations between phthalates and markers of diabetes risk, we conducted stratified analyses using the same model in the two gender groups (males and females) and the three major racial/ethnic groups (white, black and Mexican-American).
Twenty-eight genes were identified as gender-specific genes using the same criteria (FDR<4% and>1.3-fold between the two gender groups).
A random effects model was conducted using the same adjustment factors as above except substituting gender mix with clinician gender.
In the Rights of Woman, Wollstonecraft does not make the claim for gender equality using the same arguments or the same language that late 19th- and 20th century feminists later would.
All four gender conversions were performed using the same parameters values as described above.
Using the same experimental design we test whether there is a gender difference in deception.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com