Often the different numbers of categories arises while all studies in principle use the same categorization, but in different studies different categories are lumped together.
We used the same categorization of metabolic connectivity but did not find it helpful in explaining the observed variation in the fitness response to gene overexpression (r = −0.029, P = 0.6).
We used the same categorization as in the Western New York Breast Cancer Study (WNYBCS) [ 5], the most comprehensive study assessing CYP17 genotype as a potential effect modifier, in an attempt to replicate findings with an independent data set.
To explore whether our findings are consistent with those reported by Longnecker et al. (2001), we adjusted for the same covariates and used the same categorization of p, p′-DDE levels (serum p, p′-DDE < 15 μg/L for the low exposure category and > 60 μg/L for the high exposure category).
The principle aim of this paper is to compare recognition and categorization using the same set of stimuli.
To obtained the prediction accuracy for speeds 6 and 12 during incorrect categorization, we randomly draw n = 10 trials from only incorrect trials using the same method as described above.
Using the same set of novel artificial objects (called Ziggerins), we modeled our two training regimens after the sort of experience thought to underlie face individuation and letter categorization, respectively (see Fig. 1).
Using the same process, continue.
We used the same GO categorization criteria as above to annotate the S. cerevisiae and N. crassa mitochondrial proteomes [ 72, 73] to compare their global functional profiles to that from C. cacaofunesta.
