Your English writing platform
Free sign upSimilar(60)
Methodological quality was assessed using the updated QUADAS-2 tools.
We examined the methodological quality of the studies using the validated QUADAS-2 tool for assessing the quality of such studies.
For each study, two review authors independently extracted data using a standardized form and assessed study quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.
The screening of the full texts, the data extraction, and the methodological quality assessment, using the adapted QUADAS-2 tool, were conducted independently by two reviewers with disagreements being resolved through discussion or arbitration.
We evaluated the quality of the eight included studies using the QUADAS-2 tool.
The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, a validated tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Two reviewers independently reviewed the list of potentially eligible studies and rated the studies for quality using the QUADAS-2 tool.
We assessed the quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool.
We will assess the papers for applicability and bias using the QUADAS-2 tool 11 as well as study size and declarations of competing interests.
20 Two reviewers will independently assess risk of bias in each included study using the QUADAS-2 tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
In addition, we rigorously evaluated the methodological quality of included studies using the QUADAS-2 tool developed for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies and also assessed the impact of a possible risk of bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com