Sentence examples for using the proposed detectors from inspiring English sources

Figure 5 The BER using PIC, SIC and EIC detectors a condition of α = 0 dB in Network 1 and Network 2. The simulation results of using the proposed detectors in Network 3 and Network 4 are shown in Figures 6 and 7, respectively.

The next scenario illustrated in Fig. 6 shows the BER versus SNR plot for the cross-layer design using the proposed detectors and the greedy relay selection method, where we apply the GL-SIC/GL-PIC algorithms at both the relays and the destination in an uplink cooperative scenario with 10 users, 6 relays, and spreading gain N=16.

This experiment mainly aims at drawing a comparison of detection results using the proposed detector, the fusion operator, wedgelets, beamlets[16], the unbiased detector raised by Steger[22].

The ROC curves are shown in Figure 6 for the detectors using PCI and for the proposed detectors using SSE.

Figure 10 Note error rates for different polyphony numbers using the proposed PIC detector.

Figure 11 shows the note error rates in different levels of noise for different polyphony numbers using the proposed PIC detector when the polyphony number is estimated.

Figure 8 Comparison of note error rates for different polyphony numbers using the proposed PIC detector and the selected reference method proposed in [4].

In Figure 8, a comparison of the NER for different polyphony numbers using the proposed PIC detector and the iterative estimation and cancellation reference method proposed in [4] is presented.

Regarding the performance of the octave and fifth tests, Figure 9 represents the NER for octave, perfect fifth intervals and other intervals using the proposed PIC detector when the polyphony number is 2. In this figure, it can be observed that the NER for perfect fifth chords is smaller than the NER for octave intervals and other types of intervals.

Figure 9 Note error rates for octaves, perfect fifths and other intervals using the proposed PIC detector when the polyphony number is 2. Note that the fifth test performs better than the octave test because the overlap of the partials of the note patterns of notes with octave relation is larger than in the case of notes with fifth relation.

No differences between substitution and deletion errors are shown because the percentage of deletion and substitution errors are the same as in Figure 10. Figure 11 Note error rates in different levels of noise for different polyphony numbers using the proposed PIC detector.