Currently, there have only been two studies about morphological priming performed in Brazilian Portuguese speakers, which are Garcia et al. (2012) and Moraes, Angela Mafra De. (2015) In Garcia et al. study, the researchers performed a LDT experiment using the priming paradigm with a short SOA (38 ms).
For instance, in a previous study (Cattaneo et al., 2008) using the priming paradigm, an occipital single TMS pulse had only facilitated letter (consonant vs. vowel) discrimination for unprimed letters but TMS had no effect on primed letters.
First, the significant priming effect for fearful faces was shown using the affective priming paradigm, with the fear fear faces being judged more quickly than neutral fear faces for the unaware participants.
Although the priming paradigm used by Schacter and colleagues may be used to investigate implicit memory for visual objects, this paradigm is not very amenable for investigating whether spreading activation may exist in visuospatial memory networks.
The priming paradigm used in these investigations involves presenting three-dimensional objects, some of which are structurally possible and some of which are not structurally possible; in that they contain inconsistencies in surface structure that would preclude them from existing as actual three-dimensional objects.
Quémart et al. (2011) performed three experiments with the priming paradigm in LDT to investigate the development of morphological processing in French.
In line with these findings one would expect to see a lower priming effect of both happy and angry faces in the priming paradigm from Vermeulen et al. [11].
The LDT was conducted using a priming paradigm in which prime-target pairs shared four relationships: morphological, pseudoderivation, orthographic control, and semantic control.
In other words, assessing invariant recognition using a priming paradigm prevented the invariance endowed by perceptual constancy to be confounded with the invariance resulting from explicitly learning the associative relations among the different views of an object during training.
In the semantic conditions, there was one single effect in the left superior parietal lobule (areas 7A and hIP3), whereas syntactic priming was observed in one region close to the insula/parietal operculum.>> The present fMRI study investigated the selection of semantic, syntactic and phonological information from the mental lexicon during language production using a priming paradigm.
Using the subliminal affective priming paradigm, we obtained a significant priming effect for the fearful faces, but not for the neutral faces, showing that fear fear faces were judged more quickly than neutral fear faces.
