Sentence examples for using the preponderance of from inspiring English sources

The ad hoc committee will review whether the process was adequate and fair, using the preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not) as the standard of review.

The proposal, posted online Friday, would make expulsion the most likely sanction for students found responsible for sexual assault penetration using the "preponderance of evidence" standard.

At Roberts' sentencing hearing, he says, the judge made his decision using the "preponderance of the evidence standard," and calculated Roberts' drug weight using the more severe crack-cocaine drug table which made his penalty 100 times greater than it would have been had he been charged for the powder cocaine, another drug he was accused of distributing.

Most states use the "preponderance of evidence" proof that Hill was found to meet.

In making a finding, the investigator will use the "preponderance of the evidence" standard; is it more likely than not that the reported allegations are true.

The new "affirmative consent" law in California includes a clause requiring schools to use the "preponderance of evidence" standard.Other states and colleges are likely to follow suit.

On April 4, the Department of Education announced new guidelines "to remind schools of their responsibilities to take immediate and effective steps to respond to sexual violence". The guidelines include procedures to follow when a complaint is filed, and state that schools must use the "preponderance of the evidence" standard to resolve complaints of sexual harassment or violence.

However, the Sexual Misconduct Board uses the "preponderance of the evidence" standard to determine guilt.

AAUP goes on to criticize OCR for not giving enough attention to due process in sexual assault cases, and raps the agency for advising schools to use the "preponderance of evidence" standard, meaning it is more likely than not an accusation of assault is true, rather than "clear and convincing," which means being reasonably certain about the accusation.

At the same time, the case spotlights Georgia's bizarre state requirement that to avoid the death penalty a defendant must prove intellectual disability "beyond reasonable doubt," the only state in the nation with such a stringent burden of proof (most others use the "preponderance of evidence" threshold, meaning the defendant is most likely intellectually disabled). .

Stated another way, triangulation attempts to use the preponderance of the evidence collected to support the hypotheses, with particular attention paid to trends and consideration given to both supporting and refuting findings.