Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
In other words, there is no disadvantage to applying using the paper version of the Universal College Application or the Common Application.
Patients were given the option of completing the questionnaire using the paper version at any time.
However, GPs using the paper version reported fewer appointments than software users (on average 2.5 versus 3.5 times).
Patients were given the option of using the paper version instead of the computer at either time point.
This is a preliminary examination of existing data to determine whether there appeared to be a selection bias, or major effect, of using the paper version.
Participants spent significantly more time completing the record using the paper version compared to the online version (34.4 vs. 28.5 min/day, p = 0.045).
Similar(50)
Seventy-one (60%) patients used the computer at both visits, 26 (21.8%) used the computer followed by the paper version, 17 (14.3%) used the paper version followed by the computer version, and five patients (4.2%) used the paper version at both visits.
Seventy-one (60%) patients used the computer at both visits (CC), 26 (21.8%) used the computer initially followed by the paper version at six months (CP), 17 (14.3%) used the paper version initially followed by the computer version (PC), and five patients (4.2%) used the paper version at both visits (PP).
The participants responded using the web version in 59% of the cases, and 41% used the paper version as their final entry.
Three percent used the paper version of the data form and conducted online data entry later, and none of the first 856 patients were registered via the KMS.
A slightly higher percentage of patients with a benign adnexal mass used the paper version of the FACT-G at the six months visit (χ2 = 11.07, p = 0.026) as they were more likely to decline to come in for an office visit and request the FACT-G be sent home than were the patients with a cancer diagnosis (Table 1).
More suggestions(15)
using the paper flight
using the quantum version
using the software version
using the paper record
using the paper diary
using the watercolor version
using the paper survey
using the paper grip
using the paper tissue
using the paper disc
using the paper culture
using the paper questionnaire
using the paper system
using the youth version
using the paper take-out
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com