Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
Using the notation from Sect.
Using the notation from Figure 9, the node D should check if cos ∠ADB< 0.5.
Using the notation from Section 2.2.2, the corresponding quantization function is obtained as in (25) q u, i = Ω (QBC) H u, i : = d c q, H u, i = 1 − B u, i H q 2, (50) d c, min = d c q u, i, H u, i, (51).
Using the notation from Table 1, where the false positive rate (FPR) represents the proportion of actual negative cases wrongly assigned to the positive class.
Similar(56)
Using the notations from Remark 2.5 ii) we deduce that (2.4).
We use the notation from the definition of (G( MM _k)).
All the parameters and variables are defined on the 2-D graph Figure 2 (we use the notation from [10]).
(here we use the notation from [14], i.e., decreasing in the generalized sense) Let (or where is the generalized intersection [14]) denote the projective limit of (note for ) and note, so for convenience we write.
Throughout, we use the notation from Section 5.4.
In the following, we will use the notation from [23], because it reflects the similarities between the CSP approach and the reductions to propositional logic as outlined above.
In so doing we have to replace the Ca2+ diffusion coefficient DCa (μm s−1) with an apparent diffusion coefficient Dapp: (1) D app = D Ca + D e κ e + D b κ b 1 + κ e + κ b, Here we used the notation from [7]; κe andκb denote the endogenous and exogenous Ca2+ binding ratio, respectively; the associated diffusion coefficients are De and Db.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com