Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(13)
Estimation of sample sizes for future trials were calculated (using Stata) with 80% power and 5% 2-tailed significance using the mean difference in the rate of change between groups for each DTI metric and neuropsychological score, and whole brain atrophy, using the BBSI, to detect a 20, 30, 40, and 50% reduction in yearly change.
For paired t-tests, we calculated Cohen's d using the mean difference score as the numerator and the pooled s.d.
Further, Hedges' g effect sizes (ES) for each outcome were calculated using the mean difference divided by weighted and pooled standard deviation (Hedges 1981).
We analysed continuous data using the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Potential cost-savings were calculated from the actual and anticipated morbidity rates using the mean difference in total costs.
The sample size for this clinical study was estimated using the mean difference in numerical rating scale (NRS) for low back pain between the experimental and control groups.
Similar(46)
We summarized continuous data (means and SDs) using the mean differences (MDs).
The results were expressed using the mean differences for continuous outcomes with the corresponding standard deviations (SD), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and associated p-values.
For analysis of the interaction exenatide/placebo and responders/nonresponders, a contrast vector was built using the mean differences in caloric intake on exenatide and placebo day (see below).
We planned to use the mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) to summarise trial findings and report the treatment effect if the outcomes were measured the same way between trials.
In analyzing continuous outcomes with both fixed-effect and with random-effects models, we used the mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval.
More suggestions(15)
using the first difference
using the mean absorbance
using the mean distance
using the mean aggregation
using the mean TIACs
using the mean thickness-to-length
using the backward difference
using the spectral difference
using the temporal difference
using the mean average
using the mean recall
using the mean method
using the mean value
using the mean stretch
using the central difference
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com