Thus, we can use the geometries shown in Figure 1, i.e., named as geometry CPGE-I shown in Figure 1b and geometry CPGE-II shown in Figure 1c,d, to separate the CPGE current induced by Rashba and Dresselhaus SOC, respectively.
We begin our analysis with carrying a tensile deformation test of an alpha-helical protein network, by using the geometry and loading condition as shown in Figure 1C.
Using the geometry of nonlinear dynamical systems we show that, providing certain constraints on the structure of time delays within the system are satisfied, there exists a neural controller that can render all the dynamics of the neuromusculoskeletal system (except for time delays) unobservable in the responses.
The authors (using the geometry in Figure 19G for example) showed that there are clear extra crosslinks visible in tomograms.
Finally, we show some examples by using the geometry of real grounding systems.
Comparison of the calculated volumes of deposition using the geometries of Sp2 and Sp4 shows that the limitation of sediment supply offshore does not affect much the deposition on land (Fig. 6).
In order to simulate a single cluster environment, we use a geometry shown in Figure 1: there are two horizontal multi-element linear antenna arrays on both receiving and transmitting sides; the space between antennas contains a single scattering cluster.
In particular, one can use the geometry of numbers to show that, for discriminant with absolute value less than X, there are approximately X quadratic number fields.
Twenty-month-old children and rats were shown to use the geometry of the room to reorient while ignoring the feature cue (Cheng 1986; Hermer and Spelke 1994), whereas human adults, rhesus monkeys, pigeons, fish, and chicks were all shown to be able to conjoin both cues (Hermer and Spelke 1994; Kelly et al. 1998; Gouteux et al. 2001; Sovrano et al. 2003; Vallortigara et al. 2005).
The second task seems rather forbidding: using this discrete geometry, show how to do physics.
