Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
In general, the resolution of the 3D reconstruction is determined using the Fourier shell correlation (FSC) between two reconstructions that are obtained using the half datasets.
(B ) Final resolution was estimated as 21 Å using the Fourier shell correlation criterion with a cutoff of 0.5.
Similar(58)
The map resolution was found to be 5.3 Å using the 0.5 Fourier shell correlation criterion.
The resultant orientations of the images were used to calculate the Fourier shell correlation between two equal random groups of all the images.
Each of the six GroEL-ATP data sets and the apo data set were split into two halves and reconstructions generated, which were then soft edge masked and used to calculate the Fourier shell correlation (FSC).
Since only a moderate resolution of the 3-D reconstruction of the S. pneumoniae pilus was required in order to identify the arrangement of the backbone subunits, the final 3-D map was obtained at 22 Å resolution using the 0.5 threshold of the Fourier shell correlation (FSC) [27].
The resolution, measured using the half-bit criterion of the Fourier shell correlation, was approx. 40 Å (see Supplementary Figure S3 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/428/bj4280483add.htm).htm
The resolution for the maps is 12 and 9.2 Å for the leucyl and tryptophanyl ternary complexes, respectively, using a cutoff of 0.5 in the Fourier Shell Correlation.
The final resolutions of the 3D reconstructions were estimated from the Fourier shell correlation (FSC) curve using the FSC-0.5 cut-off criterion.
The resolution of the maps was estimated using the command eotest in EMAN2, which calculates the Fourier shell correlation (FSC) between reconstructions made by half-data sets from the odd and even numbered particles.
Because of the complex manner in which the individual repeats are reassembled, conventional methods of resolution determination, such as the Fourier Shell Correlation are meaningless.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com