Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Further, we also examined PTSD using the established cutoff score of 44 or higher [20, 29, 30].
Participants were classified as either depressed or not using the established cutoff of PHQ-9 total ≥10.
Using the established cutoff point of a frailty index score equal to or higher than 0.14, of the 228 patients, 57 were excluded from the sample because they had a score lower than 0.14, 171 had a score equal to or higher than 0.14, and 16 refused to complete the baseline questionnaire.
Similar(57)
The APRI was defined as: 100×(AST/upper limit of normal)/platelet count (109/l).[25] An APRI score>1.5 has been shown to be predictive of significant fibrosis (defined as an Ishak score greater than 3) with an the area under the ROC of 0.76 0.85.[22], [25], [25] Thus, we used the established cutoff of 1.5 to determine the presence of significant fibrosis at baseline and at the last visit.
Thus, we used the established cutoff of 1.5 to determine the presence of significant fibrosis.
For TC breast cancer risk, we used cutoff points similar to the established cutoff points [ 29].
We additionally ran the same models using the established high-risk clinical cutoff (>3 mg/L) for CRP [33].
Using the established 2.5-fold diagnostic cutoff, we achieved 100% (13/13) sensitivity for detecting primary monkeypox infection and 63% (5/8) sensitivity for detecting monkeypox infection in vaccinia-immune persons in which monkeypox was a heterologous orthopoxvirus infection.
CellSearch results were also significantly associated with PFS when the established cutoff of 5 CTCs for CellSearch (Cristofanilli, 2006) was used (P=0.013; Figure 3).
Using the previously established cutoff of 26.55 to define FSD, 50% of the sexually active women met criteria for FSD at baseline (48% in DSE and 52% in ILI).
The AUC was 0.72 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.91) with SN of 67% and SP of 71% for prediction of significant dehydration when using the previously established cutoff point of 0.8.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com