Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(20)
The SYQ curve allows us to estimate the numbers of different strains of the same species, by using the cutoff of d ≤ 2 derived from Figure 4D.
Similarly, when using the cutoff of similarity higher than 0.5, the number of the Level 1 scaffolds in MDDR to those in TCMCD is 1384.
However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of the aD1/aD4 5 ratio in APS in contrast to SARD using the cutoff of 1.5 established in another study previously [9].
Using the cutoff of ≥25% impairment, all 12 physical function sub-items met the criterion.
Sequences were considered mutated or not using the cutoff of 2% mismatch.
We examined T-scores continuously and categorically using the cutoff of T-score > 65, which is considered markedly atypical.
Similar(40)
As seen in Supplementary Figure S8A, using the cutoffs of P<0.05, f.c.>1.1 and P<0.035, f.c>1.15 for the IMPA1 and SMIT1 colonies, respectively (the choice of these cutoffs is justified under Materials and methods, and Network and Pathway Analyses sections), multiple biological functions were significantly affected both by Li treatment in the two colonies and by IMPA1 or Slc5a3 KO.
Participants were dichotomized by WC values by using the cutoffs of ≥102 cm among men and ≥88 cm among women.
Nevertheless, we also found similar results using the cutoffs of < 60 or < 53 for the MHI-5, both of which have been validated against clinical measures (Berwick et al. 1991; Friedman et al. 2005; Holmes 1998).
There was also a significant difference between the curves using the cutoffs of 0, 6-cm residual tumour tissue and >6-cm residual tumour tissue when two groups were compared at a given time (P=0.055, P=0.006 and 0.005, respectively).
Using the cutoffs of 90 and 80 cm (males and females, respectively), WC-mid had significantly higher AUC for hypertension and diabetes in women and for MS in both sexes (all age-adjusted P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com