Sentence examples for using the current level from inspiring English sources

"The result is that the benefits that may be provided by a personal pension, using the current level of rebates, would be less than those provided by the state scheme," said Axa.

In the statistical model, the effect of muscle tone on ROM was evaluated using the current level of muscle tone, measured simultaneously with ROM, and age effects were estimated using polynomial regression.

With annual reported TB cases of about 4000, it can plausibly assumed that 2000 more TB patients could be successfully treated in Temeke district, using the current level of resources.

Methods using the current level and distribution of genetic variability to estimate the historical demography of populations provide an additional tool to test demographic hypotheses suggested by simple historical observations [ 9- 12].

Service targets use the current level of service, which can be obtained from the hospitals' operational key performance indicators.

These findings may be derived from the characteristics of two parameters: the GA/A1c ratio was calculated using the two-glycated proteins, which are synthesized via a relatively long-term glycated process; however, the eAG/fPG was calculated using the current glucose level and the mean plasma glucose level.

Note that in order to meet the maximum production target of 10,000 billion cells/lot using the current performance level of 0.5 million cells/mL it would be necessary to run 17 × 2,000L SUBs per lot, thus significant cost savings could be achieved by improving the microcarrier performance.

Multiple regression analysis using the current HbA1c levels (log HbA1c) as the dependent variable adjusting for sex, age, pubertal status, diabetes duration, and insulin administration technique showed adjusted HbA1c level reductions of 5.3% (P < 0.01) for the low-RBF group and 12.9% (P < 0.01) for the high-RBF group as compared with the non-RBF group (Table 3).

Using the current rate of sea-level rise (3.65 mm y−1), a rate deemed to be relatively moderate, a landscape elevation model was developed by applying the accretion model to a LiDAR-derived digital elevation model at annual increments to 2050.

A reason for this difference between ASEK and our results may be Wilhelmsson's function-form combined with the fact that the study did not control for other negative effects of proximity to roads; that is, the marginal relation between costs and noise is probably overestimated at high noise levels using the current calculation values, a problem also noticed in ([72], p. 808).

For instance, it would be difficult using the current process to fabricate a two-level structure where the top (fine) features are not located far away from the edge of the bottom (large) features, as otherwise the edge would be overexposed due to proximity effect that results in a poorly defined feature edge.