Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(31)
Initial codes were established using the constant comparison method by two researchers involved in the study.
An inductive analysis of these data, using the constant comparison method, yields five classes of identification gaps, of acquisition gaps, and of utilization gaps.
Categories were developed inductively using the constant comparison method [ 10].
Factors were identified, and questions were coded using the constant comparison method.
Analysis was performed by a single researcher using the constant comparison technique [ 20].
Axial and selective coding took place in an iterative fashion using the constant comparison technique.
Similar(29)
We used the constant comparison method to interpret the data, looking for anticipated and emergent themes as the analysis progressed [ 21- 26].
Then, we used the constant comparison method (Strauss and Corbin 1998) among all six studies to identify and illustrate common themes as well as contrasting results.
We used the constant comparison method 8 11 to classify key concepts, expanding and refining properties of the codes with a review of successive transcripts.
55 We used the constant comparison method 55 to ensure that emergent themes were consistently classified, expand on existing codes, identify novel concepts and refine codes.
We used the constant comparison approach to identify changes in the institutions, interests, ideas, and external factors within each country across the two periods 2001 2006 and 2007 2012, before and after the introduction of both KTPs in 2006.
More suggestions(15)
using the constant b
using the constant c
using the constant algorithm
using the daily comparison
using the constant Work
using the constant pressure
using the constant speed
using the constant fraction
using the statistical comparison
using the constant model
using the constant matrix
using the constant acceleration
using the constant recycle
using the constant phase
using the constant score
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com