Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The osteogenic differentiation in MSC was evaluated on Days 0 and 27 using the analyses described above.
Similar(59)
Array probe annotations used in the analyses described in this manuscript were a merge of those obtained from the GEISHA resource website [50] and a custom annotation package compiled using R/AnnBuilder package.
The GTEx samples used for the analyses described in this study were obtained from the University of Miami Brain Endowment Bank.
All codes used in the analyses described herein are available upon request.
In addition, the cells were either cultured without cytokines or with IL-2 orIL-15 (5 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) on days 3 and 9. On day 12, seHAdV-T cells were harvested and used for the analyses described below.
IP data with frequencies of 0.1 Hz–10 kHz were used for the analyses described below, in order to maintain a high signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio and to avoid additional Maxwell Wagner effects in the high-frequency range (e.g., Leroy et al. 2008).
The datasets used for the analyses described in this manuscript were obtained from dbGaP through dbGaP accession number phs000145.v2.p2.
The correlation data used in the analyses described in this manuscript are included in Table S2 and Table S3.
The dataset used for the analyses described in this manuscript were obtained from the database of Genotype and Phenotype (dbGaP) found at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap through dbGaP accession numbers phs000020.v2.p1, phs000019.v1.p1, and phs000016.v2.p2.
Given the progressive nature of the disease it would be expected that parameters would change over a lifetime and so the 'full' dataset used in the analyses described was limited to include only those dogs that were 1, 2 or 3 years (365 1459 days) old at the time of evaluation.
Longitudinal data from the National EDEN study were used for the analyses described in this paper.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com