Interpretation of these data is confounded by the fact that there is generally little overlap between the data reported by different groups, using different analytical platforms, different sample cohorts, and different analytical pipelines.
This research investigates problems in predicting their behaviour under compression (hollow square pultruded FRP sample) using different analytical and modelling approaches.
Using the same samples enables us to correlate datasets collected using different analytical techniques.
The samples were characterized using different analytical techniques including X-ray diffraction, N2 adsorption isotherm analysis and Scanning Electron Energy Dispersive Spectroscopysive Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX).
The aim of this paper is to review and disseminate the latest information available and discuss the advantages and disadvantages found when using different analytical techniques to determine PBDEs in environmental and human samples.
As an example, UK Biobank collects a range of biological samples (blood, urine, saliva) that were tested in pilot studies using different analytical techniques, including standard biochemistry, proteomics and metabonomics [ 5, 6].
This is not surprised because the similar calibration points were used though using different analytical methods.
Using different analytical tools (i.e., parametric and non-parametric) can result in interesting insights.
These studies used different analytical methods and examined saliva collected at different points after sealant application.
In 16S rRNA-based surveys, several analytical procedures have been carried out to compare multiple microbial samples using different beta-diversity measures [ 19].
Rates were generated by using different case definitions, surveillance, and analytical methods.
