Sentence examples similar to using appropriate measuring from inspiring English sources
The phrase "using appropriate measuring" is not correct in English.
It should be "using appropriate measurements." You can use it when discussing the need for correct and suitable measurements in a specific context, such as scientific experiments or data collection. Example: "In order to ensure accurate results, it is essential to conduct the experiment using appropriate measurements."
With correct knowledge of measurement of outcome, a student would propose experimental outcomes using appropriate measures.
The cases reported here stress the need for using appropriate measures to prevent animal-to-human transmission of pathogens.
Clinical and laboratory data was described separately for patients with and without pCR using appropriate measures of location and dispersion.
Future studies that delineate the causal order of physical and cognitive change by examining in greater detail the individual rates of change and variation and the temporal ordering of individual changes in the acceleration of physical and cognitive change using appropriate measures will contribute to the advancement of current knowledge related to trajectories of healthy and pathologic aging.
Distance and time to care from patient's usual residence to the PICU will be calculated using appropriate measures for the usual mode of transport (network analysis for locations usually serviced by road ambulance and the combination of both road network analysis and Euclidean distance for areas usually served by fixed-wing or helicopter).
"Essex police use appropriate measures for whatever the crime and wherever our investigations lead us," he said.
(S/NF) Post should use appropriate measures to remove a person seeking refuge from the premises when temporary refuge is not warranted.
Second, we used appropriate measures to collect and stabilize maternal antepartum peripheral blood samples for isolating high quality pure mRNA.
Also required are exposure effect relation studies, which use appropriate measures of exposures and defined outcomes, such as an immunologic parameter or clinical sign.
The majority described their inclusion and exclusion criteria well (70%), provided a comprehensive description of treatment alternatives (90%), used appropriate measures to assess patient preferences (90%), and conducted analyses that were appropriate for the study data (80%) (Supplementary Table 3).
The authors should either provide additional information about these analyses that allays these concerns or use appropriate measures (e.g., leave-one-subject-out extraction) to avoid potential circularities.
