Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The prevalence of RISC outcomes, using a score of three or higher as the cut-off for maximum risk, according to the CFS, is presented in Figure 3b.
Similar(59)
As shown in Table 4, MOS is indicated using a score of five steps, and PSNR can be converted to MOS based on ITU-R BT. 500 11[27].
This allows the intercept to be interpreted as the average outcome for each group, rather than using a score of zero, which is not meaningful for network size.
Following previous research [ 34, 35], the total score of the scale was dichotomised for analysis using a score of zero to two to indicate a strong SOC and a score of three to six to indicate a weak SOC.
Single questions on knee pain symptoms do not allow the identification of patients with radiographic OA, but better discrimination ability was found using a score of four questions, with higher scores showing the higher discrimination ability in both sexes.
QALY were calculated from them using the area under the curve method, using a score of zero at time points at which a patient was known to be dead.
A similar 6-point scale was used and a score of four or higher (i.e. more than 50% likelihood) meant that the no-harm incident was considered preventable [ 28].
Social risk will be assessed using a score measuring six aspects of social status including: family structure, education of primary caregiver, occupation of primary income earner, employment status of primary income earner, language spoken at home and maternal age [ 116, 121, 122].
The NPI was created in 1982 using a weighted score of three independent variables (tumor size, grade and number of involved lymph nodes).
In this paper we use the most widely accepted convention of a score of three or more defined as a case [ 7].
Skeletal age of the elbow is assessed by the Sauvegrain method, using a scoring system for four anatomical landmarks of the elbow[ 28].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com