Eighteen implants coated with ErhBMP-2 (BMP group) and another 18 uncoated implants (control group) were installed using a randomized split-mouth design.
In the second experiment, using a randomized split-mouth design, half the mouths of 8 patients were treated with APP and the contralateral side with RCP by three dentists, and then the time required for plaque removal was compared.
The study was conducted for 16 months using a randomized split-plot design experiment with four replications of all combinations of treatments, the treatments being litter type and site (plantation species).
We used a randomized split plot experimental design replicated in 6 blocks (each debris-treatment main plot had four herbicide-treatment split plots).
A field experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block split plot design with three drip irrigation rates (I1: 1.00, I2: 0.80, and I3: 0.60 of the estimated evapotranspiration), and three plant population densities (D1: 48,000, D2: 71,000 and D3: 95,000 plants ha−1) as the main plot and split plot, respectively.
A field experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block split plot design with four irrigation frequencies (F1, F2, F3 and F4, irrigation events once every 1, 2, 3 or 4 days, respectively) and three drip irrigation rates (I1: 1.00, I2: 0.80, and I3: 0.60 of the estimated evapotranspiration, ET) as the main and split plots, respectively.
The experiment was carried out using a randomized complete block design with a split factorial arrangement of treatments in four replications.
This factorial experiment was arranged in a split plot using a randomized complete block design replicated three times.
The experiment was carried out using a randomized complete-block design, with a split-plot arrangement of treatments and four replications.
A two-site field experiment was carried out using a randomized complete block design with three replications and a split-factorial arrangement.
