Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
After backwards deletion, none of the previous potential confounders were proven to be substantial confounders using a cut point of 10% change the original point estimate.
We used a cut point of ≥2 points to identify individuals at high risk of falls.
Alternate analyses were also performed using a cut point of 130/8 0mmHg.
Alternate analyses were performed using a cut point of ≥100 mg/dL.
We also assessed severe hypoglycemia using a cut point of <50 mg/dL.
Using a cut-point of 32 points or higher to define CRE high risk was then validated on a cohort of patients from DMC: 166 with ESBL BSIs and 16 patients with CRE BSIs.
We followed the guidelines suggested by the PHQ manual for the interpretation of the results, using a cut-point of 5 points or more to diagnose mild depression, 10 points or more to diagnose moderate depression and 15 points or more to diagnose severe depression with the PHQ-9 section of the PHQ scale.
The ratio was dichotomised using a cut-point of 1.
The findings were replicated using a lower cut point (>18) for defining a high FRS.
MVPA/day was also compared with values derived using a group cut point (GCP).
We categorized exposure using a priori cut points at the 50th and 90th percentiles.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com