Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Cases with a disagreement of both investigators on the immunoreactive score were discussed using a multiheaded microscope until consensus was achieved.
Conflicting results were resolved using a multiheaded microscope.
The immunostainings were evaluated by two genitourinary pathologists blinded for patient outcome using a multiheaded microscope.
Cases with disagreement were discussed using a multiheaded microscope until agreement was achieved.
Whenever there were some discrepancies in the evaluation between observers, a consensus was reached using a multiheaded microscope.
A final agreement was obtained for each score by using a multiheaded microscope (Olympus BX51 10 headed microscopes).
Similar(50)
Cases in disagreement were jointly reviewed under a multiheaded microscope and the consensus count was used for analyses.
At the time of sign out with the attending, all cases are reviewed and discussed by the entire team together at a multiheaded microscope.
Large academic centers typically have a daily conference to discuss difficult cases, and specimens can be viewed by a few experts through a multiheaded microscope.
Three observers evaluated the immunostained slides simultaneously on a multiheaded microscope.
Differences in the evaluation were discussed at a multiheaded microscope until consensus was reached.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com