Suggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Data were described using a median value or using mean ± standard deviation, if they failed or passed normality testing, respectively.
Finally, we also examined the association between PSS dichotomized into high vs. low using a median value cutoff.
Patients were grouped according to high/low tTP gene expression using a median value cut-off (0.20, IQR 0.080 0.51).
A Kaplan Meier curve of survival using a median value of 18 lymphatic vessels as a cutoff did not show any discrimination in survival with high- or low-lymphatic counts.
As was observed using a median value cut-point, the prognostic performance of the combined 14 gene HRneg/Tneg index using a third quartile cut-point was superior or comparable to that of the individual HRneg or Tneg indices in their respective training cohorts.
Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that index values computed from the 11 genes identified from the HRneg training cohort (HRneg index) or from the 7 genes identified from the Tneg subset (Tneg index) were able to dichotomize their corresponding training cohorts into significantly different DMFS outcomes using a median value cut-point (log-rank P = 2.04 × 10-7 and 1.73 × 10-5, respectively).
Similar(54)
We used a median value of 99.98%.
To find a representative HIV-related module under a specific stage, thus, we used a median value of multiple co-expression scores for an interaction and a median expression level for a protein, respectively.
This overexpression translated into reduced survival wherein the 5-year actuarial probability of overall survival was 45% for high EZH2 expressors versus 82% for low expressors, using a median expression value of 10 as the cutoff.
Patients were sub-grouped according to high/low sTP protein expression using a median cut-off value [0.072 ng/mg (total protein content), IQR 0.044 0.11].
First, we analyzed |∆Hb| and overall survival in all cancer patients as well as in patients with individual cancers using a median cut-off value of 2.6 g/dL measured in all cancer patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com