Sentence examples for using a confidence score from inspiring English sources

Only interactions between the proteins belonging to the palmitoyl proteome dataset were selected using a confidence score ≥ 0.9 (high confidence).

Results [Table 1 and Additional file 3] also showed accurate genotyping (99.91% HapMap concordance), and with higher automated call-rates (94.91% – using a confidence score threshold of 0.75).

Additionally, by assessing the predictions using a confidence score, we have been able to provide a putative GO‐BP term for 1422 previously un‐annotated genes or about 77% of the un‐annotated genes represented on the microarray and about 19% of all of the un‐annotated genes in the D. melanogaster genome.

This module includes two components: a novel boosting method to train the variant classifying model using high-confidence variants (e.g. common variants in HapMap as GATK recommended); and ranking of the likely true variants using a confidence score (details in the method section below).

This was established using a confidence scoring based method on the number of different data sets in which the interaction was recorded, the number of different types of experiments supported the interactions, and the number of species in which the interaction was discovered (Geisler-Lee et al., 2007).

The AxiomGT1 algorithm uses a confidence score of 1 – p(X), where X is the assigned genotype call.

A second measure of uncertainty uses a confidence score from each expert; this score expresses the expert's confidence in the available data used to make the point estimate.

We use a confidence scoring scheme, which is based on the fact that the more a protein and a cellular compartment are co-mentioned, the more likely the protein is to be localized to the compartment (see Methods section).

The three readers first evaluated the standard postchemoradiation (restaging) MR images and scored the likelihood of a complete response of the primary tumor using a confidence level score (0 = definitely residual tumor, 1 = probably residual tumor, 2 = possibly residual tumor/possibly complete response, 3 = probably complete response, 4 = definitely complete response).

Cell-type-specific interactomes were created using a confidence cutoff score of 0.8 and random walks completed using a restart probability of 0.7.

The peptides and corresponding relative abundances were obtained in ProteinPilot using a confidence cutoff (called a 'Prot Score') of > 1.3 (> 95%).