Sentence examples for uses different definitions of from inspiring English sources
UNESCO uses different definitions of "youth" depending on the context.
One possible explanation is that each study uses different definitions of gastric/intestinal phenotypes.
Unfortunately every study uses different definitions of adverse events (for example, serious infections defined as requiring antibiotics versus requiring hospitalization) and in many studies it is difficult to extract the exposure-years to a specific drug since only duration of follow-up of patients is mentioned.
Additionally, researchers have used different definitions of diarrhoea with differences in what frequency (two or three times a day for two consecutive days) constitutes diarrhoea, and the term 'loose' has not always been quantified.
These differences may be due to using different definitions of AKI, which in some studies included a fixed cutoff for sCr (>1.4 mg/dL) [ 24, 25] rather than relative changes in creatinine from baseline values and UO.
It cites differences between modern civil legislation and the older criminal laws using different definitions of neglect, and that in the criminal law, only physical abuse is recognised.
However, these studies on persistent frequent attendance used different definitions of frequent attenders and lacked the power to detect differences in morbidity between transient and persistent frequent attenders.
However, studies on persistent frequent attendance used different definitions of frequent attendance and lacked the power to detect differences in morbidity and prescription data.
Using different definitions of health equity the eight guiding studies may result in the difference of identifying the same conditions related to equity.
As the Times put it, "in various models controlling for different factors and using different definitions of tense situations, Mr. Fryer found that blacks were either less likely to be shot or there was no difference between blacks and whites".
But The Times reported K.K.R.'s profit as $520 million, while The Journal pegged it at $146 million — a result of using different definitions of "profit".
