Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
users tested for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "users tested for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the subjects or participants involved in a testing process, often in research or product development contexts. Example: "In our study, we focused on users tested for their reactions to the new software interface."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
There were 396 townships with drug users tested for HIV infection and 222 townships without drug users tested for HIV infection.
Science
There were 398 townships with drug users tested for HCV infection and 220 townships without drug users tested for HCV infection.
Science
229 townships without drug users tested for HIV or HCV infection.
Science
There were 389 townships with drug users tested for both HIV and HCV infection.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
By 2011 estimates, around 66percentt of all current, and 28.5percentt of former injectable drug users tested positive for the virus.
News & Media
More than 30% inconsistent condom users tested positive for HIV/STI, compared to a smaller proportion of consistent condom users (32.3% vs 9.7%, p=0.085), but the association is not significant.
Science
Blood and nasal secretion samples were collected from five plasma-positive chronic intranasal drug users and tested for HCV RNA using RT-PCR.
This paper describes the process of ethical deliberation about how best to obtain informed consent from sex partners of injection drug users (IDUs) tested for HIV, within a recent HIV study in Eastern Europe.
Science
And a new app will let users test themselves for sexually transmitted diseases by urinating onto a computer chip then plugging it into their phones.
News & Media
57 per cent of Russians infected with the virus acquired it through drug use, with around 20 per cent of the country's large number of known drug users testing positive for the disease.
News & Media
The most prominent risk factor was intravenous drug use, with 7.4% of intravenous drug users testing positive for HCV.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "users tested for", ensure the context clearly specifies what the users were tested for to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify if they were "users tested for HIV" or "users tested for usability".
Common error
Avoid using "users tested for" without specifying the purpose of the test. Ambiguity can confuse the reader. Always clarify what the users were tested for to provide clear and concise information.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "users tested for" functions as a noun phrase followed by a past participle phrase acting as a post-modifier. It identifies a specific group of people based on a testing process they underwent. As Ludwig AI notes, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
30%
Formal & Business
20%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "users tested for" is a grammatically correct and usable expression to describe a group of individuals who have undergone a specific test or evaluation. Ludwig AI confirms its appropriateness for written English. While its frequency is uncommon, it is most often used in scientific, news, and formal business contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that the purpose of the test is clearly specified to avoid any ambiguity. Alternative expressions, such as "users evaluated for" or "participants screened for", can be used depending on the specific context and desired emphasis.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
participants tested for
Replaces "users" with "participants", often used in research settings.
subjects tested for
Similar to "participants", common in scientific and experimental contexts.
users evaluated for
Replaces "tested" with "evaluated", suggesting a broader assessment rather than a specific test.
users assessed for
Similar to "evaluated", indicating a general assessment or appraisal.
individuals tested for
Replaces "users" with a more general term, "individuals".
users screened for
Emphasizes the process of identifying specific traits or conditions.
people examined for
Uses "examined" instead of "tested", implying a more in-depth investigation.
patients screened for
Focuses on a medical context, with "patients" as the subject and "screened" as the action.
candidates evaluated for
Suggests an evaluation process for potential candidates or applicants.
population surveyed for
Implies a broad survey or investigation of a large group.
FAQs
How can I use "users tested for" in a sentence?
You can use "users tested for" to indicate that a group of users underwent a specific test. For example, "The study involved "users tested for HIV" infection."
What's a good alternative to "users tested for"?
Alternatives include "users evaluated for", "participants screened for", or "subjects assessed for" depending on the context.
Is it more appropriate to say "users tested for" or "users who were tested for"?
"Users tested for" is more concise and generally preferred, especially in formal writing. However, "users who were tested for" is also grammatically correct and can be used for emphasis or clarity if needed.
In what contexts is the phrase "users tested for" commonly used?
The phrase is often used in scientific research, medical studies, and usability testing reports to describe the individuals who underwent specific evaluations or examinations. It also appears in news media reporting on studies and health-related topics.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested