In this article, we discuss the application of drama and dramaturgy to user-centered product concept design (UCPCD) processes, aiming to create a more holistic approach to designing user experiences.
A graphical interface for children seeking information contained in the National Library of Public Information (NLPI, renamed from National Taichung Library) database is developed by applying a user-centered design concept.
Although the Design Lab is new, members of the Design Lab helped introduce the fundamental concepts of user-centered system design (through a book with that title UCSD) in 1987, which today is called human-centered design.
Using personal strengths, skills, experience, and knowledge, and ways to bring usability to an organization were demonstrated that did not yet understand the concepts of user-centered design or recognize the value of usability.
This chapter introduces the basic concepts behind user-centered design, introduces stakeholders and their requirements, teaches you how to prevent resistance from stakeholders, introduces you to the kinds of arguments you may encounter, and provides suggestions for strategies to deal with them.
We adopted user-centered design process to develop the concept model and usability concept to evaluate it.
While it is difficult to create completely error-free interactions in software design, the issue of how to make users feel better when they encounter errors is critical to the concept of user-centered design.
We describe our ongoing research investigations aimed at defining a user-centered design approach that uses the concept of persona to analyze and model the future users.
In this paper, we describe a user-centered design of an automated multifaceted concept-based indexing framework which analyzes the semantics of the Web image contextual information and classifies it into five broad semantic concept facets: signal, object, abstract, scene, and relational; and identifies the semantic relationships between the concepts.
For example, McNeese et al. [2] identified four systems design paradigms wherein each produce a qualitatively different outcome: Technology-Centered, User-Centered, Data-Centered, Group-Centered.
