The negative accuracy scores for adversarial users mainly stems from the penalization scheme where incorrect answers are penalized (i.e., gets negative score)—[recall that score calculations are explained in "User score calculation" section (Table 4)].
Part of the way Uber maintains "standards" is by using a consumer-driven rating system that lets each user score the driver from one to five.
Recent users and ex-users scored equally poorly in comparison to the control group on tests of recall and verbal memory.
Even after controlling for I.Q., other drug use, age, sex, depression and other variables, long-term users scored significantly lower than control group members and shorter-term users on tests of verbal fluency, memory and coordination.
Massively popular film review website Rotten Tomatoes (it has 22 million users) scored it at just 35%, with critics and audiences alike dismissing it as a dull, brainless sequel.
Most CI users scored very poorly in the PRO-24.
Consumptive users scored lower in aesthetics and were less supportive of protection in the high support group, while nonconsumptive users showed the opposite trend.
While we found no significant difference between heavy and light users of Internet on extroversion and neuroticism, it was found that the heavy users scored high on self-concept.
The non-users scored the areas of reduced risk and greater sustainability more highly than users, but still with the maximum of 30% of non-users being concerned only.
Thus, self-confessed users scored higher on social projection, explicit attitude to doping and perceived pressure.
