Clinical usefulness was evaluated using information from the original studies.
The perceived usefulness was studied using questionnaires to be filled in by the CPB social workers.
Usefulness was categorized as useful for self, others, self and others or not useful.
Šumak et al. (2011) collated Electrical Engineering and Computer Science students' perceptions of using a general virtual VLE (Moodle) and reported that perceived usefulness was a strong predictor of intention to use the VLE.
Perceived usefulness was an essential reason for using eCDS in general or its particular function, e.g. drug alerts.
However, the sense of usefulness was evaluated with a single question, whereas we used a scale, a procedure more suitable for measuring elaborated constructs.
Perceived usefulness was found to be significantly determined by perceived ease of use, resulting in an R2 of 61.7%.
His usefulness was almost exhausted.
But his usefulness was over.
The usefulness was not universally acknowledged.
But beyond that, I thought its usefulness was moot.
