Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Due to the fairly low proportion of comments scoring above 5 on Usefulness, the data for the Usefulness score used in the analyses did not follow a normal distribution.
The "usefulness" score is computed separately for each feature and each of the thresholds.
Individual scores on Usefulness were calculated as the proportion of a participant's comments with usefulness score above 5.
The dependent variables were calculated as follows: Individual scores on Usefulness were calculated as the proportion of a participant's comments with usefulness score above 5.
We replicated the ANOVAs with two alternative measures for usefulness, mean usefulness rating and number of usefulness ratings above 5, to check that our choice of usefulness score did not unduly impact our analysis.
The overall usefulness score was considered to be the ultimate indicator of strength of provider preference for the CPR.
Similar(52)
Producers were categorized based on technology use (using technology vs. not using technology) and differed significantly across technology usefulness scores, daily milk yield (using technologies: 4.83 ± 0.07 vs. not using technologies: 4.50 ± 0.10), and standing estrus (using technologies: 4.68 ± 0.06 vs. not using technologies: 4.91 ± 0.09).
These additional analyses showed the same pattern as the analyses using the average usefulness scores.
To assess general acceptability of the framework and recommendations, accredited nurse immunisation providers were presented with them in three annual update sessions, and 104 completed a short questionnaire about usefulness (scored from 1 'not at all useful' to 10 'extremely useful'), realism (not at all/somewhat/very), strengths (open question), and areas for improvement (open question).
Usefulness scores were calculated as the average of the analysts' ratings on two scales: Relevance and Inspiration.
To check this possible source of bias, an additional set of usefulness analyses was run with the usefulness scores obtained only from the other analyst.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com