Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Views on WISH Project strategies and GAP materials will be elicited by seeking the level of usefulness using a five-point Likert scale (very useful; somewhat useful; undecided; not really useful; not at all useful).
The results indicated that a majority of students used the video podcasts frequently, rated them as useful or very useful, viewed them as easy to use, effective learning tools, and reported significant knowledge gains in pre-calculus concepts.
Not useful 0% Somewhat useful 52% Very useful 48% If you used the videos to replace going to lecture, how many lectures did they replace?
Incorporating a clinical scenario into procedural teaching using simulators was felt to be very useful or somewhat useful by 83 of the participants, (Table 2).
They also rate the usefulness of each section using a 0 5 scale ("Not at all useful" to "Very useful").
Seven participants (M=4.2,S D=0.92) answered iPCA was "very easy" and "easy" to use and eight participants (M=4.5,S D=0.85) mentioned iPCA was "very useful" and "useful" for solving the given analytical task questions. Figure 7 Post-evaluation results.
In the second round (May 2012), also via an online questionnaire, panellists were asked to rate QIs on a 9-point Likert scale for clarity (1 = not clear at all; 9 = very clear), usefulness (1 = not useful at all; 9 = very useful), to rephrase unclear and to add missing QIs.
Opinions on usefulness and responsibility were sought using numerical scales (0 = "not useful" to 10 = "very useful", and 0 = "trainee responsible" to 10 = "supervisor responsible", respectively).
Besides, 76%% of participants think that Wiki is useful to be reused in the future (13 % very useful and 63 % quite useful), others believe that their usefulness is limited (22%%) or not useful (2 %) (Fig. 3b).
For questions Q10, Q11 and Q13-16, the user response was recorded as a measure of "how informative, consistent, easy-of-use" with 1 represented "not useful at all" and 10 representing "very useful".
Almost all speech pathologists had used a stroke CPG and had found the guideline "somewhat useful" or "very useful".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com