Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(44)
To determine if elevations of adhesion molecules in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are useful for risk stratification.
BACKGROUND Several biomarkers have individually been shown to be useful for risk stratification in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).
Future studies are needed to determine if measurement of troponin levels among patients with decompensated HFpEF may be useful for risk stratification.
Based on evidence currently available, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has defined principle markers useful for risk stratification in acute PE (Table 2) [3].
This retrospective study demonstrated that the Duke score is useful for risk stratification and prognostic evaluation of patients in a chest pain unit.
Are serological tests (pepsinogen I, II, I/II, H. pylori antibody) useful for risk stratification?
Similar(16)
Analysis using a logistic regression model that included the electrocardiogram, cTnT, and cTnI showed that cTnT was the most useful marker for risk stratification.
These findings should provide useful evidence for risk stratification and updating clinical follow-up guidelines.
WDR66 might be a useful biomarker for risk stratification of esophageal squamous carcinomas.
However, angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis is a widely accepted and clinically useful method for risk stratification in CAD patients.
These findings should provide useful evidence for risk stratification, updating clinical follow-up guidelines, and possible intervention studies.
More suggestions(15)
serves for risk stratification
usefulness for risk stratification
advantages for risk stratification
needed for risk stratification
useful for risk communication
useful for risk analysis
useful for risk screening
useful for risk selection
useful for risk assessment
useful for risk management
useful for risk monitoring
useful for population stratification
useful for risk characterization
useful for risk prediction
useful for risk adjustment
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com