When participants were asked to assess the usefulness of CAM, only 5 patients described the CAM they have used as "not useful at all", and 7 patients reported experiencing side effects due to CAM use.
In the second round (May 2012), also via an online questionnaire, panellists were asked to rate QIs on a 9-point Likert scale for clarity (1 = not clear at all; 9 = very clear), usefulness (1 = not useful at all; 9 = very useful), to rephrase unclear and to add missing QIs.
For questions Q10, Q11 and Q13-16, the user response was recorded as a measure of "how informative, consistent, easy-of-use" with 1 represented "not useful at all" and 10 representing "very useful".
It will consist in the number of missed sessions, and satisfaction at 3 months post inclusion using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not useful at all) to 10 (extremely useful) for the intervention group.
Regarding the usefulness of both methods team members had to select between not useful at all = 1; hardly useful = 2; neutral/undecided = 3; a bit useful = 4; and very useful=5.
Participants were asked to rate 22 predefined interventions on a 5-item-Likert scale regarding the usefulness of these interventions to promote primary care (1 = not useful at all up to 5 = very useful).
In the multivariate logistic regression model, the only independent variable which maintained a significant influence was the opinion about Internet usefulness (OR and 95%CI for comparison between options "not useful at all" and "unsure", "useful" and "very useful" were 3.56, 1.25-10.18; 6.94, 2.13-22.59 and 11.06, 2.49-49.01, respectively).
"I don't think this is useful at all.
"The main question is whether it's useful at all and in what conditions".
They do little that could be regarded as useful at all.
In Somalia, he said almost nothing useful at all and just got randomly beaten up for making snarky remarks.
