Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
When acute sera from patients infected with CVA16 were used, significant differences between the two methods were observed.
When mortality data was used significant differences were identified in the sensitivity of species to planting environment but this was not related to locality, mean annual temperature or rainfall at seed-source.
When the original assay N°1 (ELF1α) was used, significant differences were observed between Ct values of samples from the S. salar and Oncorhynchus species.
Although only one genotype was used, significant differences in AI were detected for 37% of probe sets examined that contained heterozygous SNP loci.
Similar(55)
Different letter were used to significant differences, chi-square test (p < 0.05).
The yardstick method can only be used on significant differences in the analysis of variance [28, 29].
For non-parametric data, Kruskal-Wallis following Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction were used for significant differences.
Kruskal-Wallis test was used for significant differences in medians across categories of 25(OH D.
Tukey's (P ≤ 0.05) multiple comparison procedure was used when significant differences were found.
Post hoc testing was performed when appropriate, using least significant differences.
Means were separated using least significant differences (LSD) (P = 0.05) [ 36].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com