Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(34)
An additional study by Ott et al. [12] used review characteristic features in addition to unigram and bigram term-frequencies.
Oh, and yeah, HP is going to provide the winner with a brand-spanking new model so we don't have to giveaway a used, review unit.
A commonly used review criterion for a GWA study is whether it is accompanied by internal (e.g., within consortium) or external (independent studies by other research groups in different populations) replication evidence.
We used Review Manager 5.1 to meta-analyse study outcomes.
We used Review Manager version 5.0 for statistical analysis.
We used Review Manager 5.1 for the analysis.
Similar(26)
Results were analyzed using Review Manager 5.1 software.
The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Meta- analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.0 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Results were analyzed using Review Manager 5.1 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK).
The meta-analysis was performed by using Review manager 5.0.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com