Comparison is used for check node operation, deactivation, and zero-forcing process.
Thirty-one sets of kinetic data collected at 220 °C with a low extent of deactivation were used for kinetic parameter regression.
To hopefully resolve this disparity, we compared our imaging results with electrophysiological data obtained in ferrets by applying the same deactivation protocols used for the imaging.
Furthermore, Ca2+ oscillations mediated during the activation-deactivation cycles are used for signal transduction by a majority of cells (2, 51).
The deactivation model gave good predictions of the CO2 breakthrough curves and it was successfully used for the evaluation of the adsorption and the deactivation rate constants.
As the enzyme was subject to suicide deactivation upon incubation with HQ, only initial rates recorded within 20 seconds after the addition of substrate were used for determination of kinetics.
This approach can also be used for the in silico identification of new targets against pathogen infection, as demonstrated here by the identification of PLCγ1 as a target for ERK1/2 deactivation.
For imaging the deactivation process, a combination of a 413 nm long-pass filter (SR-FF02 409/LP-25, SR-FF02 409/LP-250 nm Semrockand filter (FES0550, Thorlabs) was used for excitation.
In reporting results for BOLD signal changes we use deactivation for decreased or negative BOLD signal, and activation for increased or positive BOLD signal.
Therefore, the APP-LLR, which was calculated in the previous iteration, is used as a criterion for deactivation.
