Sentence examples for used features are not from inspiring English sources

A scientist might observe that the used features are not exactly the ones defining the groups; the presence of four limbs is not a synapomorphy of vertebrates.

But it is also wonderfully easy to use – the features are not just there to visually impress.

Image features are not used; instead, geometry, global jitter, ghosting artifact, and SPN are used.

Auto manufacturers play up the horsepower, the size of the engine, the handling, even the number of cup holders, but safety features are not used to sell cars.

However, these features are not used in this work.

If the synthetic features are not used in node splitting of a synthetic forest, the resulting forest should closely approximate a regular forest, and thus performance of SRF should closely approximate performance of RF.

As these features are not used in English, they can be quite difficult for learners to grasp.

Unlike other image retrieval problems, local features are not commonly used in person re-identification [9, 12].

This is a bit counter-intuitive, since rare features are not frequently used in text and thus do not have a big impact for text classification.

For SA, however, this is not a big issue since many sentiment-expressing features are not frequently used within an individual review.

The labelling of study designs and the descriptions of study design features are not consistently used.