Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(9)
One controversial explanation for these findings is that the most commonly used cutoff value for selecting patients for l-z (facet) joint RF denervation, greater than 50% pain relief after diagnostic blocks, is too low and hence responsible for the high failure rate.
In these cases, we used cutoff value 0.05 (Table 3).
With the widely used cutoff value 0.5 mg/l, PATHFAST demonstrated suitable sensitivity but not STRATUS.
The currently used cutoff value for anti-H titer against S. enterica serotype Paratyphi A in Nepal is ≥ 1 80.
19, 41 We chose the most frequently used cutoff value of 1 400 for diagnosis by single titer.
Our results suggested an optimal cutoff value of 21, which is higher than the widely used cutoff value of 16 (sensitivity 91.3%%, specificity 60.8 %).
Similar(51)
If the value is significant (for which we used cutoff values of 0.05), then it is possible to give an overall ranking of the objects that have been ranked.
Used cutoff values vary between studies ranging from 10%to20%19 19, 27.
Different trials have used cutoff values of 0.1, 0.25, 0.4, or 0.5 μg/L.
We then used cutoff values of 0.1 - 1% the frequency of the index sequence to indicate probable mis-sequencing events.
We also used cutoff values of the Dutch national Central Bureau of Statistics to allow a comparison with other Dutch professionals.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com