Exact(4)
Both key words and MeSH headings were used (Appendix 1) [see Additional file 1].
However, scores were more variable for questions relating to details of the evidence base or sources of information used (Appendix 1, Questions 4 and 5).
Self-reported tobacco use (never, less than daily, daily) and tobacco use assessed by measuring serum cotinine biomarker measures were used (Appendix 1).
As urine contains relatively few cells, an HPV assay (HPV Inno-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extrassayay, Innogenetics, Gent, Belgium) with a high analytical sensitivity was used (Appendix 1).
Similar(56)
The MOOSE and PRISMA checklists were used (Appendix 2: Additional file 2) [ 18, 19].
There was no substantial change when different prior information was used (Appendix 4 [Supplementary Data]).
For each species, 42, 42, and 30 genotypes from P. edulis (all from EMBRAPA), P. setacea (30 from EMBRAPA and 12 from UESB), and P. cincinnata (all from EMBRAPA), respectively, were used (Appendix S1).
Analysis and reporting In the 34 scientific publications, various analytical approaches were used (Appendix 3, see Supplementary data, Table 4), varying from descriptive statistics, all studies, to multivariate techniques such as mixed linear modeling (Nerland et al. 2014, Robinson et al. 2013) and propensity modeling (Kasliwal et al. 2012, Adogwa et al. 2014).
If we disregard the clipping function (we will explain in a few moments how to deal with clipping), using Appendix 1, the statistical moments are well approximated by: ν E i, Δ t j ≈ − 1 2 σ o, j 2 + α j Δ t j E i α j Δ t j 2 E i 2 − β ij 2 α j (20).
For patients who indicated multiple places of infection with identical data quality estimates, the coordinates of the place closest to the spatial mean center of tularemia in Ljusdal or Örebro were used (Appendix Table 1, and Appendix Table 2).
The best-fitting model confirmed that pushing was the more efficient technique compared to pulling, as we found a significant effect of technique used (Appendix Table A8).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com