Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
In the present study we used a binary outcome variable: "poor" response individuals were classified as "non-responders", and "moderate" or "good" response individuals were classified as "responders".
As clinical endpoint we used a binary outcome variable indicating if the tumour metastasized or not.
For this review, we have considered only those articles which used a binary outcome.
Firstly, we used a binary outcome analysis to compare the incidence of lymphoedema, determined according to the chosen criteria.
In addition, we used a binary outcome measure (1=no disability pension and 2=any disability pension).
For the purpose of sample size estimation of the overall study, we used a binary outcome and associated measures of sensitivity and likelihood ratio as determinants of the value of these tests.
Similar(52)
We examine the statistical properties of the proposed design using a binary outcome under different types of covariate by treatment interactions and treatment allocation schemes.
Data were fitted with a logistic regression using a binary outcome.
We focus on the 26 articles that presented results using a binary outcome.
In 1996, Assendelft et al 8 conducted a meta-analysis using a binary outcome ("success or failure").
Stepwise logistic regression models were constructed using a binary outcome specification for the presence or absence of malignancy in lymph nodes.
More suggestions(15)
used a generic outcome
used a bivariate outcome
used a binary coding
used a last outcome
used a binary choice
used a binary sequence
used a binary fitness
used a primary outcome
used a superior outcome
used a binary encoding
used a fixed outcome
used a binary scale
used a surrogate outcome
used a binary split
used a composite outcome
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com