Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
We began to use this prosthesis at the beginning of 1951, and we have used it in sixty-five cases.
Similar(59)
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of mismatch when using this prosthesis.
Good early and intermediate results have been reported in young, active patients using this prosthesis.
The FE models predict that the biomechanical function of the pelvic ring can be reestablished using this prosthesis.
One hundred eighty-three total knee arthroplasties were performed using this prosthesis on 146 patients, with a minimum of 7 years of follow-up.
In the remaining 53 procedures, the indication for using this prosthesis was an absent posterior cruciate ligament and a deficient medial or lateral collateral ligament but a competent extensor mechanism.
We have used this prosthesis in cases where the bone stock could give direct rigid stability for the implant, i.e. in revisions where the bone deficiencies were mild to moderate.
The fabrication and use of this prosthesis requires satisfactory interarch space for adequate denture base thickness and esthetics.
However, caution must be exercised with regard to this complication even if the rate is low because it is a consequence of placing the mesh in direct contact with the bowel and accounts for the hesitation with the use of this prosthesis.
Recently, some surgeons have expanded the use of this prosthesis to treat other shoulder conditions, such as irreparable rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis; preliminary studies have had favorable short-term results [ 28, 39].
Our aims were to (1) assess pain relief and functional improvement and preservation of the appearance of the thumb as reflected by improved Buck-Gramcko scores [ 5]. (2) We also wished to radiographically assess the prosthetic reconstruction during followup and (3) document what complications occur with the use of this prosthesis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com