Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
About 81.3% believed that they would embrace the opportunity to use the MR system again in the future.
The Treatment 2 was to use the MR system (user can move his/her marker in hand and view the model from different angles via HMD) where the subjects in two different rooms were able to see their own virtual ductwork model floating above the corresponding real tracking marker via their HMD (see Figure 6b).
Similar(58)
Questions 12 15 were more related to the comfort issues involved in using the MR system.
It was found that using the MR system produced neck strain in some users.
It was observed that the subjects using the MR system completed the task much faster than the subjects using the NavisWorks Roamer commercial visualization software.
Table 1 Evaluation of the subjects' experiences of using the MR system and the NavisWorks Roamer, rated from 1 (poor) through 5 (excellent) No. Questions NavisWorks Roamer MR F Value p-value Significant Difference?
The subjects' task performance using the MR system was therefore improved by reducing the frequency of such electronic exchanges of the static red-lining comments and saved viewpoint between subjects.
The belief that there has been an increase in self-satisfaction from the collaboration as a result of using the MR system is well supported by 63% of the users.
Hypothesis 5 is well supported because subjects using the MR system had higher ability to maintain sense of location and orientation as they navigated the model than when using NavisWorks Roamer (MR: Mean, 4.1; S.D., 0.7; NavisWorks Roamer: Mean, 3.2; S.D., 1.16).
Question 12 responses indicate almost all the subjects had a fairly uncomfortable experience with long-term use of the MR system, with a very low mean rating of 2.06 (S.D., 1.28).
This does not support Hypothesis 2. The users' neck and back strain (approximately 10 20 minutes of use) in the MR system was induced by the long-time uncomfortable poses for inspecting details of the model and the physical weight of the HMD.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com